Illegal chambers: Islamabad bar wants SC to review its verdict

Says it's unfair target only lawyers
Apr 08, 2021
Photo: Online
Photo: Online

The Islamabad Bar Association has submitted an application in the Supreme Court requesting the court to review its order to demolish the chambers of lawyers in Islamabad.

On March 2, the court upheld the Islamabad High Court’s verdict to demolish the illegal chambers constructed on Islamabad’s F8 football ground and dismissed the SBCA’s appeal.

Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed in his decision said that all illegal chambers must be demolished, adding that lawyers don’t have any claim on the football ground. “If someone wants to practice, then that person can open their office somewhere else.”

Several applications against the encroachment are pending in the Islamabad High Court, the lawyers’ body said in its review appeal.

It is unfair to demolish just the lawyers’ chamber and not other structures, the application said. Real facts were not presented in the court, it said, adding that the court did not hear the arguments of the lawyers.

Islamabad High Court’s verdict

On February 16, the Islamabad High Court announced a similar verdict.

A 30-page judgement of a larger bench, authored by Chief Justice Athar Minallah, said that the chambers were “illegal, void and without jurisdiction and authority”. The court noted that records show that office-bearers of the Islamabad District Bar had “allotted plots in favour of some lawyers for construction of private chambers” in 2017. The bar did not obtain any “permission or authorisation from the authorities”.

The bar members have been instructed to clear the “illegal construction” and “restore the playground for public use”.

The ground is situated “next to a commercial area where the administration of the Islamabad Capital Territory had rented privately-owned buildings more than four decades ago for establishing the District Courts,” the court said. “The playground was encroached, and some construction has also been raised by a few enrolled advocates for building their private chambers.”

The people from the neighbouring buildings use the playground for “unauthorised parking”, it said.

Lawyers vandalise Islamabad High Court

On February 8, the lawyers in Islamabad staged a protest after their chambers at the judicial complex were destroyed by the Capital Development Authority. They also stormed the chamber of Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Athar Minallah.

An FIR was registered against them at the Ramna police station. It included Section 7 [punishment for acts of terrorism] of the Anti-Terrorism Act and the following sections of the Pakistan Penal Code:

  • 506: Punishment for criminal intimidation
  • 452: House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint
  • 440: Mischief committed after preparation made for causing death or hurt
  • 427: Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees
  • 395: Punishment for dacoity
  • 353: Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty
  • 342: Punishment for wrongful confinement
  • 341: Punishment for wrongful restraint
  • 228: Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding
  • 186: Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions
  • 149: Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
  • 147: Punishment for rioting

Read: FIR registered against lawyers for ransacking Islamabad judge’s chamber

According to the written verdict issued by a 3-member bench hearing the misconduct case against the lawyers, “The mob, after breaking open the main door of the Chief Justice’s Block, resorted to vandalising and desecrating public property.”

“Later, the chief justice and judges were held hostage for more than four hours. The judicial proceedings remained suspended for the rest of the day. The litigants were deprived of their rights and thus dispensation of justice was disrupted,” the verdict read.

Supreme Court

Tabool ads will show in this div